A
couple of years ago, I created an averaged index based statistical
analysis formula for rating overall baseball team performance, with the
goals of prognosticating post-season caliber teams, and being scalable
enough to compare team performance at all levels of play and
competition. I worked on the formula, during my free time, over the
period of a couple of weeks, then tweaked, tested, re-tweaked, and
retested the formula until I thought I got it right. Today, I am
unveiling the Matt-metrics score for the Cincinnati Reds and Cleveland
Indians. I intend to update these scores every week, during the
baseball season, with an explanation of the fluctuation of the score.
In anticipation of questions, I am including some information about the Matt-metrics rating system.
Question: What is the actual Matt-metrics formula you created?
Answer:
The goal of any blog site is to establish a loyal readership and repeat
visitors, and if I made the formula available to the public, nobody
would need my blog pages or me around. For the previously stated
reasons, I am not publishing the Matt-metrics formula.
Question: What are the criteria included in the Matt-metrics rating system?
Answer:
While I am not divulging everything, the system is based on per game
averages, and includes some of the following statistics and information:
- Overall team performance such as: run differentials, strength of schedule, and winning percentage
- Team hitting statistics such as: batting average, on-base plus slugging percentage, runs batted in, stolen bases, and walks
- Team pitching statistics such as: batting average against, earned run average, saves, strikeouts, and walks
- Team defensive performance such as: errors and overall defensive quality of play
- Adjustments for Designated Hitter leagues
- Escalators for less tangible information, such as individual and team achievement awards
Question: What are the maximum and minimum obtainable Matt-metrics rating scores?
Answer:
A perfect, or an absolute worst, Matt-metrics rating score simply does
not exist, because a team cannot pitch perfectly then continue hitting
for infinity, without recording any outs, and record a complete game.
Conversely, a team cannot be on the losing end of the aforementioned
scenario.
Question: How good or reliable is the Matt-metrics rating system?
Answer:
The results from my limited testing of the Matt-metrics rating system
appear highly accurate, but the sample size is
small. In fact, the sample size is too small to speak about the
validity of the Matt-metrics rating system. On the positive and
reassuring side, the Matt-metrics system can't be much less accurate
than the College Basketball RPI ranking system, the College Football
BCS ranking system, or a certain sports network's NFL power rankings
each season.
The Matt-metrics rating scale:
| Matt-metrics score: |
Matt-metrics indicator: |
| 1701+ |
Championship caliber |
| 1601 - 1700 |
Strong championship contender |
| 1501 - 1600 |
Post-season caliber |
| 1401 - 1500 |
Missing the post-season |
| 1301 - 1400 |
Not playing good baseball |
| 1201 - 1300 |
Playing bad baseball |
| 1 - 1200 |
Playing very bad baseball |
Disclaimer:
Matt-metrics ratings and scores exist for entertainment purposes only. All Matt-metrics information is provided as is and without any warranties of any kind. Do not use Matt-metrics information for gambling or any other illegal activity.
Remember, baseball games take place between two teams on the field of play for a reason, because anything can happen at a baseball game. Remember, even the most respected sports prognosticators in the world considered "experts" in their profession are wrong nearly half of the time. Statistically speaking, using this information to gamble on sports events will guarantee a potential loss of all money wagered. Gambling on sports ruined the professional sports careers of Art Schlichter and Pete Rose. Please do not let gambling on sports interfere with, or ruin your personal and/or professional life.

